Democrat ruled ‘out of order’ after listing off Trump’s legal woes on the House floor
WASHINGTON â Action on the floor of the House of Representatives paused for more than an hour Wednesday after Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., listed off the criminal charges former President Donald Trump is facing.
âWe have a presumptive nominee for president facing 88 felony counts, and weâre being prevented from even acknowledging it,â McGovern said during debate on the House floor, suggesting that House Republicans had prohibited any honest discussion of Trump’s trials. âA candidate for president of the United States is on trial for sending a hush money payment to a porn star to avoid a sex scandal during his 2016 campaign, and then fraudulently disguising those payments in violation of the law.â
House Republicans quickly pushed back on McGovernâs words, with the back and forth leading to a lengthy delay as House staff figured out how to proceed. His remarks were eventually ruled to be out of order.
The situation started when McGovern, the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, referenced the Republican members of Congress who have attended Donald Trumpâs hush money trial in New York. âMaybe they want to distract from the fact that their candidate for president has been indicted more times than heâs been elected,â he said.
Alabama Republican Rep. Jerry Carl, who was in the chair presiding over debate, reminded McGovern to ârefrain from engaging in personalitiesâ towards the presumed presidential nominees.
McGovern shot back, asking if it was âunparliamentary to state a fact?â
He then asked why a Republican member last week could call the Trump trial a âshamâ on the House floor and not face the same admonishment by the chair. During a May 15 floor speech, Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy repeatedly referenced the âsham trial against the former president in New York,â which he said ârelies on an unreliable witness being presided over by a biased judge.âÂ
While Carl said he would not weigh in on that, McGovern started going through Trumpâs legal situation.
“He’s also charged with conspiring to overturn the election,â he said of Trump. âHeâs also charged with stealing classified information, and a jury has already found him liable for rape and in a civil court. And yet, in this Republican-controlled House, itâs okay to talk about the trial, but you have to call it a ‘sham.’âÂ
At that point, Indiana Republican Rep. Erin Houchin interjected, asking that McGovernâs âwords be taken down.â Representatives can make that request if they feel one of their colleagues has used disorderly language.
After more than an hour of staff members huddling on the floor, Carl ruled that McGovernâs “offensive words” were out of order, citing past rulings by House speakers.
Specifically, Carl pointed to rules that prohibit members from using “personally offensive” language about the president.
“The accusation that the president has committed a crime or even that the president has done something illegal is not in order,” Carl said.
Though Trump is no longer in office, Carl added that precedents have afforded this same treatment that presidents receive to presumed nominees.
Having his words stricken from the record meant McGovern was not allowed to speak on the House floor the rest of the day after
âThey can silence me on the House floor, but they canât silence me here,â McGovern told reporters later outside of the Capitol. âAnd, you know, thereâs nothing I said that I regret. Thereâs nothing I said that is inaccurate. I didnât characterize the trials.”
A similar situation occurred in 2019 when then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., referred to Trump’s tweets as “racist” during floor debate. When her words were ruled out of order, Democrats voted to prevent them from being stricken from the record and to allow her to retain the ability to speak on the floor for the day.
âThis is a cult,â McGovern said of Republicans. âI mean, they go to extreme measures to protect Trump, you know. And any which way they can. And theyâre awfully sensitive.â
Rebecca Kaplan contributed.
